Rethinking Being Like the “Cool Kids”

In the past, the media often portrayed the “cool” skater kids as the kids who perform daredevil tricks, speeding down the ramps, without helmets or pads. (Think Rocket Power.) When I was younger, I was really into rollerblading (I still am) and I was the girl that always tried to race out of the garage before my parents could notice that I wasn’t wearing a helmet. I was already the only girl playing street hockey with the boys on our street, and I didn’t want to look like a sissy with my helmet on… At the time, I didn’t understand why it was so important it was to wear a helmet. I knew about concussions, but they only lasted a week or two, right?

There has been a growing amount of research around the long-term impacts of concussions and other traumatic head injuries, and the physical damage they do to the brain. A recent study conducted by Albaugh, Orr, Nickerson, Zweber, Slauterbeck, Hipko, Gonyea, Andrews, Brackenbury, Watts, and Hudziak (2015) investigated the physical changes in cortical morphology among adolescents who had a history of concussions. Specifically, they targeted boys ages 14 – 23 who played ice hockey. They underwent neuroimaging and took a baseline Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) testing. ImPACT tests are universally used to measure concussion symptoms in cognition. Their concussion history and baseline measures of psychopathology were also recorded.

Cortical thickness is a general term for the thickness of the layers of the brain tissue in the cerebral cortex. In mammals, cortical thickness corresponds to perceived intelligence, and larger cortical volume indicates increased behavior flexibility (Kolb & Whishaw, 2001). Cortical thickness is also correlated with number of neurons. Most mammals show almost exactly the same amount of neurons when the same volumes of cortex are compared (Kolb & Whishaw, 2001)

Results showed that higher scores on the ImPACT test, indicting greater endorsed post-concussion symptoms, were related to less cortical thickness in brain areas. Specific brain areas that indicated this were regions of the left medial prefrontal cortex and left temporal cortex. Albaugh et al. (2015) also found an “Age by Concussion History” interaction for cortical thickness in right ventrolateral prefrontal and right parietal regions. People with history of concussions showed reduced rates of age-related cortical thinning. Cortical thinning is a normative process that happens as we age. Reduced rates of this process are associated with anxious/depressed symptoms and attention problems.

There are different degrees of concussion severity. Typically, the severity is measured through performance on the ImPACT test through various cognitive symptoms. Common symptoms include difficulty concentrating, difficulty remembering, fatigue, and mental fog. In the past, it has been thought that these symptoms are only present when recovering, similar to when you catch a cold. These long-term effects, however, are important when considering safety measures in contact sports such as hockey and football. Sports leagues should use this knowledge to strengthen their regulations and requirements on safety headwear, because ultimately, you only get one brain and you have to take care of it!

Works Cited

Albaugh, M., Orr, C., Nickerson, J., Zweber, C., Slauterbeck, J., Hipko, S., Gonyea, J., Andrews, T., Brackenbury, J., Watts, R., Hudziak, J. (2015). Postconcussion Symptoms Are Associated with Cerebral Cortical Thickness in Healthy Collegiate and Preparatory School Ice Hockey Players. The Journal of Pediatrics, 166(2), 394 – 400.

Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2001). An introduction to brain and behavior. Worth Publishers. Retrieved from http://books.google.com.

Advertisements

One thought on “Rethinking Being Like the “Cool Kids”

  1. As an ice hockey player with two older brothers who were also involved in the sport, I have essentially grown up in rinks. As the years have passed, I have witnessed countless hits and injuries, many of which turned out to be concussions. However, similar to the thinking posed in the beginning of this article, I have never thought much of it. Usually, the question asked wasn’t “how will this affect your brain in the long term?”, rather “when will the individual be back on the ice?” This post has given me insight to see that these concussions have the potential to be more serious than a 2 week stint on the bench. Although I have multiple friends who have had to retire from sports due to multiple concussions in high school or college. This makes me wonder what the limit is for a doctor to tell an athlete they need to hang up their skates, or take their helmet off for good. Is there certain damage they look for to say enough is enough? It would be interesting to learn about this further.

    Additionally, I have always wondered about the methodology of the impact test and how accurately it measures the severity of concussions. I know from having to take the test (for baseline purposes), I was not putting in much effort or thought and wonder how this could affect my scores if I had to take it later on down the road for an actual concussion.

    Overall, this article has made me think more about concussions and their long lasting potential impacts on the brain. I hope now that they are becoming more frequent in our society stricter rules will be enforced and more research will be done about them.

    Megan Fortier
    Biological Basis of Behavior

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s